Friday 19 October 2012

Photo Dump!

A very quick second photo dump.  I think I might be reaching the end of photos that can do with revisiting but I think what I have found has been fairly reasonable.

Battersea Power Station


Big Ben and the houses of parliament

This was during a 'Super Moon' where the moons brightness was 30% more than usual.  A long exposure produced unexpected results!


 At a monkey temple in India





I think this was in Agra, India

 Taj Mahal

Taj Mahal

Windows 8...

I, like a great many others, was quite taken aback by Microsoft when then released Windows 7.  Here was an operating system that not only looked great, but it was brilliant in it's workflow and usability.  MS had made all the necessary changes to Vista to make it a far more complete OS without losing the familiarity of XP.  XP was the last time that MS really out did themselves in upgrading a new OS and I guess if you look at the pattern of their releases it came as no surprise that Windows 8 is an utter hash job.


 Windows 7 is a robust and user friendly OS, but it's also a systems administrator friendly OS.  It's SA friendly for a couple of reasons, the first being that it protects itself well from people accidentally making errors and but it also didn't lose functionality and familiarity of XP.  This was awesome because when you sat a user down in front of their newly build Windows 7 machine you were able to say to them "You're familiar with Windows XP?  Well this is pretty much the same but you have all this great added functionality such as aero snap, an intelligent explorer search function, pinning applications to the taskbar and a massively more functional start menu".  Within all of this they had also made it a damn sight prettier.


Windows 8 is only one of these things.  It's prettier.  I personally believe that Microsoft have shot themselves in the foot with this release for a couple of reasons but I will get to that in a moment.  Microsoft have always lagged behind in the 'cool' market.  Despite having a huge presence in the gaming market with XBOX they still don't have an image of cool or desirable.  Their mobile phones have historically been a non event, and even sometimes worse, they've been borderline offensive in how unusable they were.  Their Zune brand has been a flop despite the hardware being stunning simply because they don't have the marketing prowess of Apple.  It's because of this that they constantly strive to get a foothold in the home and mobile marketplaces.


Historically Microsoft has made the majority of its revenue from the enterprise market, Server, MS Office, SQL, Sharepoint etc.  In recent years their home PC and Entertainment divisions have been picking up a fair amount of their overall revenue but they have begun to see this fade off a bit.  The reasoning for this is that consumers no longer see a need for a fully blown desktop.  They can play games, check email, browse the internet and watch movies all on their iPads, Android devices and on a whole host of netbook style devices.  Tied in with this is that stylistically, Apple especially, these devices have a desirability about them and an extremely well marketed 'cool' factor.  For every PC that would sell with Windows on it MS would be making money.  If consumers don't need or want a PC because an iPad or their mobile phone/phablet/tablet does everything they need, why spend 2,3,4 times the amount on a Desktop that will only take up space and ultimately become a virus and spyware filled liability?



Enter Windows 8.  Windows 8 is not Microsoft's first foray into the mobile tablet form factor nor is it the first time we've seen the 'Metro' interface.  This first popped up in the recent version of Windows Mobile.  What this is is a change in the way that Microsoft has prioritised it's desktop operating system.  Windows has primarily been about covering all bases, both home and enterprise.  Windows 8 is not about this, I suspect that Microsoft would like to think that it is, but I would beg to differ.  The reason I say this is that the overriding UI is aimed at touch screen mobile devices and translates into swipes and gestures for the greater part of it's functionality.  That's great for those using a tablet or touch screen device, not so great when you're using a mouse and keyboard.

I mentioned that I though that MS had shot themselves in the foot with this release.  My reasoning is relatively simplistic, and it goes like this.  I said that when you put Windows 7 (or any previous iteration of Windows) in front of a normal office worker, they can intuitively figure out where they should go to find stuff (and I say intuitively because they've spent the last 15 years using the same form factor).  Windows 8 is not like this.  It has no start button, when you go hunting for it you'll find that it kicks you back to the Metro interface completely overriding the desktop.  I can only imagine the frustration that this will bring on with secretaries, legal staff, accounting staff in fact all staff other than the most tech savvy.  This is only one example of changes, they've altered the way search works, it's now not so immediately context driven and it doesn't present smart results like Windows 7.  

There are a whole bunch of ultimately frustrating and needless changes that have been made and I believe that this will do two things.  One, it will alienate those users that are not 'power users' that come into work, push the power button and expect familiarity.  Change is not great for these people.  It increases their work load and their frustration spreads around all the people they work with.  Second, if they have a bad experience with Windows and Microsoft product at work, then they sure as hell won't be going home and saying "we need a new PC, let's go buy another Windows machine".  They're going to pull out their iPad and go "this is nice and simple to use, let's get a Mac!"

To be fair the majority of enterprise environments will likely still be migrating the last of their machines from XP to Windows 7 so they will pass over this version, but for a company that is so driven to get a foothold into the home and mobile market, it seems foolish to me to alienate their enterprise customers.  I've already seen that Apple are gaining in a big way in the corporate environment with iPhones and iPads.  If Microsoft doesn't back track in one way or another with Windows 9 to attempt a hearts and minds win then I think we'll see more and more people moving to Apple.

Personally I won't be touching Windows 8 with a 10 foot barge pole.  It has no appeal to me, it gains me no added functionality and promises too many frustrations.  I guess we could see some changes in SP1 (it's a common rule with MS operating systems to wait for the first service pack releases) but I don't believe we will see them backing down from the overall functionality because Microsoft are so desperate to get into the tablet section of the market.  Personally I don't see it, just like I don't see their Windows Mobile Phone devices doing well either.  For all the prettiness, Microsoft just isn't 'cool'.

Saturday 13 October 2012

Photo Dump Time

I've been going back through my old photos and seeing if there were any that justified a re-process or something that I missed. I think I found a few but I also really have seen how many of the good shots were flukes out of thousands that I'd personally consider to be chaff. These are the ones that I had a second look at. They aren't brilliant but I liked them enough to put them on Flickr. 

In terms of processing I try to take each photo on its own merits and apply processing that I personally feel compliments the image the best. Having said that I can't help but feel that I've kinda been influenced by the instagram plague that seems to be rapidly destroying snap photography on Facebook and the like but hopefully with a more thoughtful application than a stock processing filter.




















Wednesday 10 October 2012

Self Portraiture

Something that I have always wanted to get into is portraiture.  It's not an easy thing to do because everyone has a very definite idea of what they should look like and there are some tricks for getting the best out of someones face.  An everyday snap is typically quite a laid back affair and if the photo turns out great then it tends to be a bit of a fluke.

I'm not going to pretend that I know too much on the subject but I thought I'd start off with taking a self portrait and see where it gets me, if only as something to refer back to as I learn and hopefully get better.  It took about 170 odd goes because it's important to not only get the eyes in focus but also to maintain some depth of field and that is a tough thing to do when you can't see through your own view finder!  So here I am.



Tuesday 2 October 2012

Comet! October! 2013! Woo!

Linked from: Gizmodo.  URL:http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2012/10/astronomers-discover-huge-new-intensely-bright-comet/

Image source: Gizmodo

Something to really look forward to - Allegidly the comet could reach a brightness great than that of the moon.  That is crazy cool.  Living in Australia, it sounds like the perfect opportunity to make a trip out to the Northern Territories on a photography mission... actually I have several reasons why I want to head out there but just this one will do!

Speaking of which, I think it might be time to get working on a photo dump...  it's always the way though - too many photos, too good at procrastinating to process them...

Apple iPhone 5 - The Maps Debacle

I've been sitting back and watching the Apple iPhone 5 release unfold with some interest.  It's kinda been the first really major release from Apple since the great Steve Jobs left this world and, personally, I was hoping for something that was actually a bit of a departure from the stock expectation.




Did Apple disappoint?  In some ways yes, in others no.  iPhone 5 saw an increase in screen size, a removal of the glass back and a slight change in the UI layout (if adding a row of icons can be described as a change in UI).  It also saw them take another step away from the shared Apple/Google ecosystem by removing the GMaps from the core OS as part of the iOS6 update.  The other major change was with the connector but that was in many ways expected.

Just briefly on the form factor change.  Really it was about time.  iPhone when placed next to any other high end smartphone looks like a poor cousin in terms of screen size and I'd have to say that the added real estate  has to be the most welcome change.  Getting rid of the glass back was something of a necessity as I suspect that the expense incurred by Apple through smashed chassis had to have hurt.  It also means that the phone can be a little lighter and a little thinner.  Headphone socket at the bottom... meh, I think you might find that there is an added reason for this with docks since the analog audio function has been removed from the dock connector but then it might just be because that's the only place they could fit it in.




Changing the dock connecter from the standard 30 pin to their new 'Lightning' connecter strikes me as a pessimistic and ultimately exploitive move essentially there to generate more income.  There is nothing (yet) that the connector does that a Micro USB connector can't do and, from a customer perspective, it means that everyone is going to buy a whole stack of new peripherals.  The Lightning connecter has an 'advantage' in that it can be inserted any way thus removing the frustration of trying to jam your socket in the wrong way.  What they seem to miss is that the Micro USB plug actually has a large 'B' on one side of it which means that you should be able to tell which way is the right way just by touch.  The other thing of note is that the Lightning connecter has electronics built into it that will make duplicating the cables a slightly pricier prospect and unfortunately for the consumer it means that it will be a long time before we can buy the $5 versions off eBay etc.  Once again Apple is treating their customers like money bags...




Other than a processor update and some other very small OS tweaks, the main thing that has been rearing it's head amongst the media has been the exclusion of Google Maps from iOS6.  Apple still has a year left on their contract with Google Maps and so had no financial reason to exclude it from the iOS6 release so we can safely assume that it is part of their greater roadmap to remove any form of reliance from their nearest competitor.  After dredging up some of the interweb scuttlebut I've discovered that their inhouse mapping App was shoehorned into the iOS6 release with a matter of weeks left and it seemed to have undergone the bare minimum of field testing.

I don't know about anyone else, but mapping plays a major role in my mobile experience.  I rely on it almost every single day and I take great comfort in knowing that if I get myself lost, I have a very powerful mapping tool to get me back on track.  I would go so far as to say that the mapping and navigation functionality of my mobile is the single most important application that it has, closely followed by its music capability and then email/messaging and finally as a phone.  For Apple to have pushed this out with such a small, apparent, amount of field testing shows a lack of foresight.  Apple are in a place where they are vulnerable to being shot down for the smallest failure.  With Steve Jobs gone, the tech world is waiting for Tim Cook to go to pieces and for Apple to follow.

An old boss of mine made a very astute call once.  He said "perception is reality".  This is very true, regardless of whether the mapping functionality of the iPhone 5 is actually any good or not, the media and those that are not enveloped in Apples 'reality bubble' are just waiting for any excuse to shoot them down and they gleefully lept on the mapping failure as ammunition.  To add to the fun, Tim Cook has issued a subsequent apology to the lack of apparent quality of the app and suggested using one of the other competitors apps in place - that being either Nokia or Microsofts Bing Maps.  What Apple has done is allowed for the perception of their product to be tarnished.  Jobs had a flare for dressing up his releases with a charismatic delivery of pomp and glitter that was swallowed up whole heartedly by the media and Apple fans alike.  Tim Cook has not maintained that, the smoke and mirrors have cleared and suddenly the flawless gem is a vat grown knock off with a big crack down the middle.

Apple are in a 'Tall Poppy' situation currently and they have handed the media and the Apple haters a massive chunk of ammunition to 'cut them down'.  Personally I've got no real problem with this because Apple set themselves up to be the elite in a seriously underhanded way through patent litigation and sometimes when you build a reputation on falsehoods and smoke and mirrors it comes back to bite you in the ass.  I don't like the way Apple do business.  I don't like the fact that they've just handed the world's landfills a huge array of old dock devices and I especially don't like the fact that they keep releasing the same device over and over with the only major changes being to take away functionality.  Yeah... I don't like Apple a whole lot.  I'm more interested, these days, in what Windows Mobile is coming up with but for now I'll stick with the environment that doesn't treat me like a slightly retarded purse...

Tuesday 25 September 2012

Passing the time

Over the last few months I've been taking the time to learn about something that has always been of interest but was unfortunately difficult to indulge due to living in the middle of a city.  Well actually more than one thing but they're all fairly intertwined.

As a child I'd always been very interested in radio controlled thing... pretty much anything that moved and could be controlled was cool, but things that could fly, well now, that was super interesting!  As an adult and having the means I've now had the chance to start indulging!

The other side of RC aircraft is that you often have to either build of assemble these things which in my mind is as much fun as the actual flying.  There is something extraordinarily gratifying about taking something in it's component parts and assembling them to a state where they will not only fly, but fly well.


I started the process with attempting to build a small glider out of balsa wood and taking the motors off a small F22 RC toy... this ended in abject failure.  The reason for this failure was unknown to me and yet to be learned.  Well actually there were multiple reasons - wood too heavy, wings not big enough, centre of gravity all wrong.  Informed hindsight can be a damning thing sometimes!



Of course the next logical step was to up the complexity odds... or not.  Watching videos on Vimeo got me a bit interested in Quadrotor helicopters, specifically this one:



mwc quad - fiberglass frame from warthox on Vimeo.


So doing the standard guy thing, I took the suggested parts list from www.quadframe.com and bought them with the absolute bare minimum experience in either the electronics or the radio gear.


The process of building was as much about learning about the technologies involved as it was putting the stuff together.  It also gave me the opportunity to re-learn my soldering skills.

Quadrotors or quadcopters are very clever things that rely on the torque from the motors for yaw and motor speed for pitch and roll.  They have small electronic gyroscopes on the controller board that help to damp out any instabilities but they need to work in unison with the motors speed controllers which unfortunately mine didn't.  The end result for me was that any large control inputs resulted in a large oscillation and having it fall out of the sky.

Not having the disposable cash has meant that I haven't been able to revisit the project but it's certainly on the books for very soon.

I did manage to get it up and flying though and got a fair amount of joy out of it but I did manage to chew through propellers a tad faster than I might've liked.  Here's a vid of it in flight.  You'll see at a couple of points what it looks like when the oscillations kicked in.  To try to minimise the damage I put some aluminium rods on the bottom and an old helicopter canopy on it to keep oriented whilst I was learning.



Thursday 20 September 2012

Gay Marriage


The gay marriage debate has been going on for a bit now and I've had the opportunity to carry a fairly extensive discussion with several people that are vehemently against both the concept of gay marriage and also the people involved.

It's all been pretty long winded and, of course, extremely emotive.  I'll state my position now, in that I support gay marriage whole heartedly.  My stand point on marriage itself is that it's entirely a personal thing.  What other people do, what other people think and/or say should have absolutely no bearing on your own marriage nor on your relationship with your spouse.

Getting into the debate was something of an exercise in patience and involved a great deal of research and being careful to not just broadly take a totally intolerant approach.  I figured that there had to be some logical and structured reasoning behind having such a solid and immovable opinion on what seemed to be such an important thing to those in the against team.

Now clearly there is one group that has the loudest voice when representing the against team and that is from Christianity.  I myself was bought up a Catholic and was to all intents a perfectly good Sunday Christian.  I suspect that this is greatly true for the majority of church goers.  It's the whole mentality of 'if I go to church on Sunday once a week than that is my heavenly requirement'.  It was this hypocrisy that pushed me away from faith and ultimately from believing in a God at all.  That and having a religious education teacher essentially self destruct when I asked about evolution in Catholic School... woops...

The basis for the argument is as follows (and I'm paraphrasing but I believe that it's the gist of the thing).  "Homosexuality and gay marriage is wrong because it says so in the Bible".  OK.  I get the overwhelming control/guidance that the Bible gives to Christian believers and in most things it's very clear.  Thou shalt not Kill, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not blaspheme etc...  All pretty obvious stuff and from a moral perspective, things that I can get on board with... without needing the Bible.  Much like Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus and Buddhists.  It's pretty much ingrained in all of us that killing is bad, stealing is bad, shagging your neighbours wife is bad... the blaspheming thing is pretty much a religious thing which I, and most other reasonable people can leave.

So in looking into this "because it says so in the Bible" we start to discover that it's not as clear cut as all of that.  It's not in the 10 commandments, it's not actually clearly stated anywhere in the original texts and even the more recent biblical publications do not state emphatically that homosexuality is against Gods law.  The truth of the matter is that it's an interpretation of some obscure references that people have decided to place on the same level as killing, cheating and stealing.  Thinking about it we know why you don't kill, because the person at the receiving end comes out in a pretty bad way.  We know why you don't steal, you're depriving someone of something that is theirs.  We know why you don't rape, cheat or commit adultery, we even know why the Bible says 'Don't take Gods name in vain'.  They're all pretty obvious and the moral aspect of it is ultimately very clear.  So here is my question.  Why is being gay bad?  Who does it hurt?  What moral code does it conflict with?  What human decency does it impinge upon?  The answer is simple - IT'S NOT AND IT DOESN'T!

Interestingly the very recent 'translations' of the Bible have been rewritten to 'clarify' the meaning of the 5 most quoted passages of text.  They have actually been re-written to include the word homosexual, a word that didn't exist when the texts were first penned.  I think the reasoning behind this is pretty simple.  It's basic prejudice.  It's people that clearly have an issue resolving with something different, with something that doesn't fit with their 'norm' so they have trolled through the Bible and found some extracts that could in the loosest of terms be interpreted as being 'possibly' anti gay.  The gay marriage thing is an extrapolation of a loose interpretation.

This is fine.  They can believe what they want.  It's their right to believe that, but when it gets forced upon other people in an oppressive and frankly degrading way, then I have an issue with it.  It's not that they don't like it, it's that they actively compare homosexuality with killers, thieves and rapists and then actively attempt to push this degrading opinion on others.  The narrow minded bigotry is stunningly blatant and the required ignorance is somewhat mind boggling.  When challenged on this front, that being of the Bibles seeming lack of clarity on the subject, I got back a very telling answer.  "I'm not God.  It's not for me to question or define sins because that would make me trying to be like God".  This blew me away because in one very simple statement they're effectively handing away any and all culpability for any of their decisions.  The implications of this fall to the very soul of religion.  Do as you're told, do not question, it's all a matter of faith.

That people are re-writing the Bible to 'clarify' content should be troubling as is it not doing exactly what a good Christian shouldn't?  Is not rewriting the texts tantamount to putting the interpreters words into the words of God?  It's not difficult logic but it's wilfully ignored.  The end result is that it's easier to ride your prejudices and persecute a minority because ultimately you don't need to question it.  It's a matter of faith and God said so... except he didn't, the Bible didn't and the persecution smacks of exactly the same thing that was happing to Black People so many years ago.  It seems that humans do not learn from history.

I find anyone telling another person that they are subhuman to be abhorrent.  I especially find someone avoiding personal responsibility for these persecutions by saying that it's what their God says to be foolish and weak minded.  For a religion whose core belief is supposed to be Love thy Neighbour and treat others as you would have them treat you.  Where goodness and compassion are supposed to be the guiding tenements there seems to be a huge amount of hate, bigotry and heartlessness going on.

Simply put - homosexuality is not bad, in fact it is the core of many loving and caring relationships of two consenting adults.  Marriage is a right that all should have as a standard of human equality and if you believe that it degrades your own marriage then you need to seriously consider how much weight you give to the conviction of your vows.

HTC Windows Phone 8X



Looks like a lovely phone. At the risk of sounding a little 'Android' fanboyish, I wouldn't mind this hardware with the Android operating system on it... you know seeing as I can't have the iPhone 5 with Android on it... (yep that's a poor attempt at humour).

Design wise it looks oddly familiar... oh yes, that's right. It's dead spitting for the new Nokia Lumia 920 phone! (http://www.cnet.com.au/nokia-lumia-920-339341626.htm) If I were them I'd be spitting all the way to courts for stealing their design. To make matters worse, Nokia are pretty much putting all their business behind the new Windows 8 Mobile OS whereas HTC has fingers in both Windows and Android pots. From the Looks of things Microsoft aren't beyond playing the hardware companies against each other which in my mind seems foolish. I would've thought the last thing you'd want are your flagship OS phones busy suing each other especially when you're trying to compete against the more organised likes of Blackberry, Apple and Google. I seriously doubt that any litigation will occur as Apple has proven that it only brings bad press and distaste from their customers.




Nokia have stated that HTC is "tactically rebranding" it's phones which kinda smacks of "tactical tact" in the face of a clear rip off. HTC has recently taken big hits from Samsung stomping all over the smart phone market with the GSIII and their recent releases, whilst not bad, just don't reach the lofty heights that their earlier devices brought to the company. Looking at the choice between the HTC phone and Nokias offering, I'd go straight to the Nokia.


The one unknown for me is Windows 8 Mobile. I don't know anyone that uses it day to day and it's not really gaining in a big way in terms of market share. In an enterprise (i.e. corporate) scenario Windows 8 Mobile might bring more rewards to Microsoft where their only real challenger is Blackberry. In my experience Apple has been making headway into the enterprise environments with the iPad, but not so much with the iPhone. With a vast share of the enterprise operating system market, Microsoft are in very good stead to challenge Blackberry at what they do best, enterprise e-mail integration. Who knows, we might be seeing more of these devices in the office... something I'd prefer to Apples offering which requires quite a bit of 'shoehorning' to get to work in a secure way.


It's great to see some really nice Windows 8 Mobile phones coming onto the market as innovation only drives more innovation.  Something that Apple seem hell bent on preventing.  On that note, I was amazed to still see people lining up outside Apple stores and puzzled as to the end user experience with getting a new toy.  There is something rather nice warm and fuzzy being able to get home and have a whole bunch of new things to play with when you get a new device.  I don't see where that experience is going to come from with the iPhone 5?  You get home with your nice new device and... it does all the same stuff as your last phone, just on a slightly larger scale...

iPhone 5


The first thing to knock off is going to have to be the iPhone 5.  Having just been released I'd have to join the general observation in that it's a resounding bundle of 'Blah'.  Slightly bigger screen, slightly higher resolution, another row of icons, thinner chassis and an aluminium back. Also a processor that is apparently twice as fast as the 4S.

No real redesign as far as looks goes, and a different dock socket (they will be releasing an adaptor for the old socket...). Looks like Apple have 

again failed on the innovation front. They simply can't keep rehashing the same thing over and over and expect to stay competitive in the mobile market. Although there will be a big number of these things getting shifted on release (September 21st) I can see a large number of Apple fans looking to move on to greener and more innovative pastures. With the likes of HTC, Motorola, Nokia and Samsung putting out new and exciting devices and daring to be a bit different, Apple is looking more and more like a one trick pony. Albeit a one trick pony with excellent aesthetic designers and a great (and wealthy) legal department.

Simply put, Apple have not delivered anything in the iPhone 5 that resets the industry expectations, that raises the bar for what a mobile device should look like or how it should perform both in speed and functionality. You have a slightly larger 4Gs... and that's it.

Interestingly they also announced a new iPod touch with which they seem to be attempting to move on the OS based camera device (like the Samsung one I mentioned earlier) but still using the very small lens and mobile form factor. It's a nice to have device but you know I still prefer my Classic iPod with a click wheel... why? Because I can keep my entire music collection on it without having to pair it down to 64GB, it has better battery life and I can use it without needing iTunes.


Need a reason to not buy the iPhone 5?

With the new dock connector Apple have done away with both the video out, analogue audio out and iPod out which means that even with the adapter they won't work with your current i-implementations or devices. So with the adapter your nice Bose speakers won't work, your car connector won't work and your radio connector won't work. Pretty much the only t

hing that will work is the charging.

To add insult to injury, not only will you have to buy all new accessories, but you don't get USB3 with it so you're still stuck with slow transfer speeds. From an environmental perspective Apple have done a great disservice also in that they're wilfully adding to landfill by making you throw away all your old chargers and dock speakers. They are effectively forcing their customers into purchasing an entirely new set of devices because the adaptor is functionally useless for anything other than charging - functionally useless at $39 - thank you Apple.

Why they couldn't just make it micro USB like all other mobile phone makers is clear - Apple consumers are seen as wallets with legs and are treated as such. Personally I wouldn't buy the iPhone 5 on principal alone. Not only are Apple anticompetitive and anti consumer but they are also ecologically irresponsible.



EDIT: 
 Interesting, it looks like Apple have been quick to respond to the adaptor issue and will be distributing the iP5 with a free adaptor. The adaptor will also apparently contain a chip that will convert digital audio to analog for the old 30 pin devices to work with. I guess I will have to retract my mini rant... partially... video is still out of the equation and any extended functionality means extra adaptors. I guess in a round about way they deserve a little kudos...

Second EDIT:Uh no... I was too quick to praise Apple. They've now said that it was a mistake on their shop site... free stuff from Apple. Don't be silly!


EEK!  Time for a Blog resurrection!

It's been almost 2 years since my last post... I wonder how many Hail Marys that is?

Clearly consistency is not my strong point but I have little else to do these days so I figured that I would return to delivering brain farts to a place where no-one is likely to view them...

There are a whole bunch of things that have me interested, riled up and otherwise engaged so back to it!